Status Epilepticus - Management, Prognosis, and EEG utilization

Categories
Epilepsy
Neurocritical Care
Slug
status-epilepticus-management-prognosis-and-eeg-utilization
Ready to Publish
Ready to Publish
Publish on
Jul 4, 2019
Project Lead
Title
Status_old
Published
Cat-Text
LinkedIn
 


Introduction

  • Status epilepticus (SE)
    • ≥5 minutes of continuous clinical and/or electrographic seizure activity
    • Recurrent seizure activity without recovery (returning to baseline) between seizures

Emergency Management

  • Non-invasive airway protection and gas exchange with head positioning Timing: Immediate (0-2 minutes) Goals: maintaining airway patency; to avoid snoring; administering O2
  • Intubation
    • Indications
      • Airway/gas exchange compromised
      • Elevated ICP suspected
      • Glasgow coma scale <8
      • If patient fails first- and second-line therapies
    • Timing: Immediate (0-10 minutes)
    • Goals: Establish secure oxygenation and ventilation
  • Initial monitoring: O2, BP, HR, and ECG
    • Timing: Immediate (0-2 minutes)
    • Goals: Establish and support baseline vital signs
  • Vasopressor support
    • Indication - MAP <70 mmHg
    • Timing: Immediate (5-15 minutes)
    • Goals: Support cerebral perfusion pressure
  • Finger stick blood glucose
    • Timing: Immediate (0-2 minutes)
    • Goals: Diagnose hypoglycemia
  • Peripheral IV access
    • Timing: Immediate (0-5 minutes)
    • Goals
      • Emergent initial AED therapy [First AED]
      • Fluid resuscitation
      • Nutrient resuscitation (thiamine + glucose)
  • Urgent SE control therapy with AED [Second AED]
    • Timing: Immediate after initial AED given (5-10 minutes)
  • Neurologic exam
    • Timing: Urgent (5-10 minutes)
    • Goals: Evaluate for mass lesion; acute intracranial process
  • Triage lab test panel
    • Timing: Immediate (5 minutes)
    • Goals: Diagnose life threatening metabolic condition
  • RSE treatment
    • Timing: Urgent (20-60 minutes after 2nd AED)
    • Treatment strategies based on individual patient response and AED concentrations
  • Urinary catheter
    • Timing: Urgent (0-60 minutes)
  • Continuous EEG
    • Timing: Urgent (15-60 minutes)
    • Evaluate for NCSE if not waking up after clinically obvious seizures cease
  • Diagnostic testing: CT, LP, and MRI
    • Selection depends on clinical presentation
    • Timing: Urgent (0-60 minutes)
    • Goals: Evaluate for mass lesions, meningitis, encephalitis
  • Intracranial pressure monitoring
    • Timing: Urgent (0-60 minutes of imaging diagnosis)
    • Goals: Measure and control ICP
    •  

Table 1: Drug categorization on the basis of level of evidence available

Level A
Definition: ≥1 class I studies or ≥2 class II studies Conclusion: Established as effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition in the specified population.
Level B
Definition: ≥1 class II studies or ≥3 class III studies Conclusion: Probably Effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition in the specified population
Level C
Definition: ≥2 consistent class III studies Conclusion: Probably effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition ion the specified condition
Level U
Definition: Lack of Studies meeting level A, B, or C designation Conclusion: Data inadequate or insufficient

American Epilepsy Society (AES) Proposed Algorithm for Convulsive SE

Initial Therapy Phase or Emergent Initial Therapy

  • Benzodiazepines are considered as agent of choice
  • I/V lorazepam through either dose method (Level A)
    • Weight Based: 0.1 mg/kg at maximum rate of 2 mg/minute
      • Wait for one minute
      • Reassess
      • If seizures continue
        • Second IV catheter placement
        • Additional doses of lorazepam can be infused
    • Fixed dose based: Initial loading dose of lorazepam 4mg fixed dose; repeated if still seizing
    • Adverse effects
      • Hypotension
      • Respiratory depression
    • Considerations
      • Dilute 1:1 with saline
      • IV contains propylene glycol
    • Treiman et al.
      • Subgroup of 384 patients with overt generalized convulsive SE (GCSE)
      • Lorazepam was successful in 64.9%
      • Terminated seizures within 20 minutes
      • Maintained seizure-free for first 60 minutes after administration
    • Advantage: Effective duration against seizures is 4-12 hours
  • If lorazepam is not available
    • I/V diazepam: 0.15 mg/kg, up to 10 mg per dose (Level A)
      • Adverse effects
        • Hypotension
        • Respiratory depression
      • Considerations
        • Rapid redistribution (short duration)
        • Active metabolite
        • IV contains propylene glycol
      • Chamberlain et al.
        • 140 patients on diazepam vs 133 patients on lorazepam (all randomized; pediatric patient groups)
        • Absolute efficacy difference was only 0.8%
        • No significant difference between both for convulsive SE treatment in pediatric population
      • Advantage: Stability in liquid form for longer periods at room temperature, hence easy accessibility and availability
  • If no I/V access available
    • I/M midazolam: 10 mg for >40 kg, 5 mg for 13-40 kg; single dose (Level A)
      • Adverse effects
        • Hypotension
        • Respiratory depression
      • Considerations
        • Active metabolite
        • Renal elimination
        • Rapid redistribution (short duration)
    • If neither of the above options are available, either of the following
    • I/V phenobarbital: 15 mg/kg/dose; single dose (Level A)
      • Adverse effects
        • Hypotension
        • Respiratory depression
      • Considerations
        • IV contains propylene glycol
    • Rectal diazepam: 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, max: 20 mg/dose; single dose (Level B)
    • I/N midazolam (Level B)
    • Buccal midazolam (Level B)
  • If seizure control has reached clinically and electrophysiologically (as seen on EEG)
    • Nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure drug loading dose should follow
    • Symptomatic medical care should continue

Second Therapy Phase or Urgent Control Therapy

  • Goals
    • For patients who respond to emergent initial therapy and have complete resolution
      • the goal is rapid attainment of therapeutic levels of an AEDContinued dosing for maintenance therapy
    • For patients who fail emergent initial therapy, the goal is to stop SE
  • If seizure continues, AED’s should be given in combination with benzodiazepines
  • Preferred second therapy of choices (given as single dose)
    • I/V fosphenytoin: 20 mg phenytoin equivalents (PE)/kg, max: 1500 mg PE/dose; single dose (Level U)
      • Adverse effects
      • Hypotension
      • Arrhythmias
    • Considerations
      • Compatible in saline, dextrose, and LR solutions
      • Infusion of fosphenytoin should be done with cardiac monitoring, due to increased risk for QT prolongation and arrhythmias
    • Advantage: Can be infused rapidly as compared to phenytoin due to reduced risk of local irritation at the site of injection
  • I/V levetiracetam: 60 mg/kg, max: 4500 mg/dose; single dose (Level U by AES 2016 and Level C by Brophy et al. 2012)
  • I/V valproic acid: 40 mg/kg, max: 3000 mg/dose; single dose (Level B)
    • Adverse effects
      • Hyperammonemia
      • Pancreatitis
      • Thrombocytopenia
      • Hepatotoxicity
    • Considerations
      • Use with caution in patients with traumatic head injury
      • May be a preferred agent in patients with glioblastoma multiforme
      • Contraindicate in Europe in pregnancy
  • If none of the above are available
  • I/V phenobarbital: 15 mg/kg; single dose (Level B)Adverse effectsHypotensionRespiratory depressionCardiac depressionParalytic ileusAt high doses, complete loss of neurological functionConsiderationsRequires mechanical ventilationIV contains propylene glyco

Table 2: Evidence for choice of AED in second therapy phase

Study
AED’s
Results
Dalziel et al. (2019)
LVA vs PHT
Levetiracetam is not superior
Misra et al. (2012)
LVA vs lorazepam
Both are equivalent
Alvarez et al. (2011)
Phenytoin vs VPA vs LVA
LVA less effective than VPA; no significant difference between VPA and PHT
Gilad et al. (2008)
PHT vs VPA
Both are equivalent
Misra et al. (2006)
PT vs VPA
VPA are more effective than PHT
Shaner et al. (1998)
DZP + PHT vs PBT
Both equally effective
Legend: LVA: Levetiracetam; VPA: Valproic Acid; PHT: Phenytoin; DZP: Diazepam; PBT: Phenobarbital
Derived from Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624

EEG Utilization

  • No data to support a standardized regimen for the intensity and duration of treatment of RSE
  • It is usually dictated by continuous EEG (cEEG) findings
  • Common practice is to achieve electrographic burst suppression
    • 1-2 sec bursts of cerebral activity interspersed by 10 sec intervals of background suppression
    • Pattern should be continued for 24-48 hours before sedation is lightened
    • During burst suppression, continuation of other AED is controversial
    • Stopping other AED to allow for down-regulation of receptors while patient is on pentobarbital may be useful

Table 3: Frequency and mortality associated with acute and chronic causes of SE in adults

Etiologies
Frequency (%)
Mortality (%)
Acute
Stroke
22%
33%
Metabolic abnormalities
15%
30%
Hypoxia
13%
53%
Systemic infection
7%
10%
Anoxia
5%
71%
Trauma
3%
25%
Chronic
Low concentration of AED
245
4%
Remote symptomatic (eg tumor)
25%
14%
Alcohol misuse
13%
20%
Tumor
7%
30%
Idiopathic*
3%
25%
Derived from Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624

Complications and Prognosis

  • Generalized convulsive SE (GCSE)
    • Complications include cardiac arrhythmias, hypoventilation, hypoxia, fever, and leukocytosis in patients with
    • Risk factors leading to increase in complications include aspiration pneumonitis, pulmonary edema, and respiratory failure
    • Important predictors of outcome
      • Etiology
      • Older age
      • Medical comorbidity
      • High APACHE-II scores
    • Increased duration of SE in the setting of acute neurological insult are risk factors for long-term neurologic disability
    • SE recurs in about one-third of patients with a first episode of SE
    • 40% of patients with first episode of SE develop subsequent epilepsy
  • Focal motor SE
    • Prognosis depends on prognosis of underlying lesion
    • Long-term morbidity in terms of weakness, sensory, and visual loss, and language dysfunction can be substantial, and many patients have severe cognitive problems
    • Cortical laminar necrosis (CLN) can be a sequela; based on case reports derived from Donaire et al.
      • Radiologically defined as high intensity cortical lesions on T1 weighted MRI images following a gyral distribution
      • Histopathologically characterized by pan-necrosis of the cortex involving neurons, glial cells, and blood vessels
      • Two patients with SE discussed in the case reports
        • Both patients displayed permanent brain imaging abnormalities consistent with CLN after prolonged focal SE
        • No metabolic or significant decreases in blood pressure during the episodes of focal SE
        • The authors hypothesized that necrosis in these patients is primarily a consequence of repeated seizures
        • The hypothesis is supported by the fact that CLN is seen in the same areas as those displaying acute cortical edema and hyperperfusion during the acute phase of SE
  • Myoclonic SE (MSE)
    • Prognosis depends on form of MSE
    • Benign primary epilepsy syndromes leading to MSE have best prognosis
    • Secondary myoclonic epilepsy syndromes leading to MSE are more refractory to AED’s
    • Poorest prognosis in patients with MSE due to an acute new illness
    • Presence of myoclonic seizures early after anoxia has been identified as a poor prognostic factor
      • 89% of patients died in a review study of 134 cases of post-anoxic MSE
Mortality
  • According to Vignatelli et al., 30-day case fatality was 39% (33% excluding postanoxic patients) in Italians
  • From a systemic review on 61 studies by Neligan et al.
    • The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality or 30-day case fatality expressed as proportional mortality
    • SE in adults
      • Estimated pooled proportional mortality of 15.9%
      • Studies before year 2000 had higher pooled mortality of 24%
    • All-age population pooled mortality ratio of 13%
    • Pediatrics: Pooled mortality of 3.6%
    • RSE: Pooled mortality was at 17.3%
  • Mortality was 15.6% among 96 patients with a first SE episode in study by Rossetti et al.
  • Seizures lasting more than 30 minutes are less likely to terminate spontaneously and are associated with a higher mortality than seizures lasting less than 30 minutes
  • Case mortality rate in patients with RSE was recorded as 38% by Sutter et al.
  • Chronic epilepsy and low AED levels are the most common causes of SE among chronic or acute causes and are associated with a relatively low mortality
  • Rosetti et al. developed “Status Epilepticus Severity Score” (STESS) to predict in-hospital mortality
    • Outcome predictors are determined before treatment institution, which are
      • Age
      • History of seizures
      • Seizure type
      • Extent of consciousness impairment
    • Maximum score of 6; optimal cut-off value at ≥3 with sensitivity of 0.94, specificity of 0.60, NPV of 0.97, and PPV of 0.39
    • Predictive value of STESS was assessed by Aukland et al.
      • STESS correlated significantly with overall mortality though with lower odds ratios
      • STESS was reliable for in-hospital mortality
      • STESS did not allow correct estimation of mortality after discharge

Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE)

 

Further Reading

Dubey, D., Kalita, J., & Misra, U. K. (2017). Status epilepticus: Refractory and super-refractory. Neurology India, 65(7), 12.
Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624.

Bibliography

  • Glauser, T., Shinnar, S., Gloss, D., Alldredge, B., Arya, R., Bainbridge, J., ... & Jagoda, A. (2016). Evidence-based guideline: treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children and adults: report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsy currents, 16(1), 48-61.
  • Brophy, G. M., Bell, R., Claassen, J., Alldredge, B., Bleck, T. P., Glauser, T., ... & Treiman, D. M. (2012). Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocritical care, 17(1), 3-23.
  • Treiman, D. M., Meyers, P. D., Walton, N. Y., Collins, J. F., Colling, C., Rowan, A. J., ... & Ramsay, R. E. (1998). A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(12), 792-798.
  • Chamberlain, J. M., Okada, P., Holsti, M., Mahajan, P., Brown, K. M., Vance, C., ... & Grubenhoff, J. (2014). Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial. Jama, 311(16), 1652-1660.
  • Dalziel, S. R., Borland, M. L., Furyk, J., Bonisch, M., Neutze, J., Donath, S., ... & Craig, S. (2019). Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for second-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children (ConSEPT): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 393(10186), 2135-2145.
  • Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624.
  • Misra UK, Kalita J, Maurya PK. Levetiracetam versus lorazepam in status epilepticus: a randomized, open labeled pilot study. J Neurol 2012; 259: 645–48.
  • Dubey, D., Kalita, J., & Misra, U. K. (2017). Status epilepticus: Refractory and super-refractory. Neurology India, 65(7), 12.
  • Alvarez V, Januel J-M, Burnand B, Rossetti AO. Second-line status epilepticus treatment: comparison of phenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam. Epilepsia 2011; 52: 1292–96.
  • Gilad R, Izkovitz N, Dabby R, et al. Treatment of status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures with i.v. valproic acid vs phenytoin. Acta Neurol Scand 2008; 118: 296–300.
  • Misra UK, Kalita J, Patel R. Sodium valproate vs phenytoin in status epilepticus: a pilot study. Neurology 2006; 67: 340–42.
  • Shaner DM, McCurdy SA, Herring MO, Gabor AJ. Treatment of status epilepticus: a prospective comparison of diazepam and phenytoin versus phenobarbital and optional phenytoin. Neurology 1988; 38: 202–07
  • Mayer, S. A., Claassen, J., Lokin, J., Mendelsohn, F., Dennis, L. J., & Fitzsimmons, B. F. (2002). Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Archives of neurology, 59(2), 205-210.
  • Strzelczyk, A., Steinig, I., Willems, L. M., Reif, P. S., Senft, C., Voss, M., ... & Rosenow, F. (2017). Treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus with brivaracetam: a cohort study from two German university hospitals. Epilepsy & Behavior, 70, 177-181.
  • Rosenthal, E. S., Claassen, J., Wainwright, M. S., Husain, A. M., Vaitkevicius, H., Raines, S., ... & Kanes, S. J. (2017). Brexanolone as adjunctive therapy in super‐refractory status epilepticus. Annals of neurology, 82(3), 342-352.
  • Zeiler, F. A., Zeiler, K. J., Teitelbaum, J., Gillman, L. M., & West, M. (2015). Therapeutic hypothermia for refractory status epilepticus. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 42(4), 221-229.
  • Ma, X., Liporace, J., O'Connor, M. J., & Sperling, M. R. (2001). Neurosurgical treatment of medically intractable status epilepticus. Epilepsy research, 46(1), 33-38.
  • McDonald, T. J., & Cervenka, M. C. (2017). Ketogenic diets for adults with highly refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy currents, 17(6), 346-350.
  • Ahmed, J., Metrick, M., Gilbert, A., Glasson, A., Singh, R., Ambrous, W., ... & Bobel, K. (2018). Electroconvulsive therapy for super refractory status epilepticus. The journal of ECT, 34(1), e5-e9.
  • Shorvon, S., & Ferlisi, M. (2011). The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol. Brain, 134(10), 2802-2818.
  • Hesdorffer, D. C., Logroscino, G., Cascino, G. D., & Hauser, W. A. (2007). Recurrence of afebrile status epilepticus in a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota. Neurology, 69(1), 73-78.
  • Donaire, A., Carreno, M., Gomez, B., Fossas, P., Bargalló, N., Agudo, R., ... & Obach, V. (2006). Cortical laminar necrosis related to prolonged focal status epilepticus. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77(1), 104-106.
  • Hui, A. C., Cheng, C., Lam, A., Mok, V., & Joynt, G. M. (2005). Prognosis following postanoxic myoclonus status epilepticus. European neurology, 54(1), 10-13.
  • Drislane, F. W. (2016). Convulsive status epilepticus in adults: Treatment and prognosis. Dostupný na www: http://www. uptodate. com/contents/convulsive-status-epilepticus-in-adults-treatment-and-prognosis.
  • Gaspard, N., Foreman, B. P., Alvarez, V., Kang, C. C., Probasco, J. C., Jongeling, A. C., ... & Gerard, E. E. (2015). New-onset refractory status epilepticus: etiology, clinical features, and outcome. Neurology, 85(18), 1604-1613.
  • Neligan, A., Noyce, A. J., Gosavi, T. D., Shorvon, S. D., Köhler, S., & Walker, M. C. (2019). Change in mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in high-income countries over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA neurology.
  • Rossetti, A. O., Hurwitz, S., Logroscino, G., & Bromfield, E. B. (2006). Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77(5), 611-615.
  • Vignatelli, L., Tonon, C., D'Alessandro, R., & Bologna Group for the Study of Status Epilepticus. (2003). Incidence and short‐term prognosis of status epilepticus in adults in Bologna, Italy. Epilepsia, 44(7), 964-968.
  • Rossetti, A. O., Hurwitz, S., Logroscino, G., & Bromfield, E. B. (2006). Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77(5), 611-615.
  • DeLorenzo, R. J., Garnett, L. K., Towne, A. R., Waterhouse, E. J., Boggs, J. G., Morton, L., ... & Ko, D. (1999). Comparison of status epilepticus with prolonged seizure episodes lasting from 10 to 29 minutes. Epilepsia, 40(2), 164-169.
  • Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624.
  • Betjemann, J. P., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2015). Status epilepticus in adults. The Lancet Neurology, 14(6), 615-624.
  • Rossetti, A. O., Logroscino, G., Milligan, T. A., Michaelides, C., Ruffieux, C., & Bromfield, E. B. (2008). Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS). Journal of neurology, 255(10), 1561-1566.
First Name
Hide
Hide
Email
@Follow
Last Name
Photo
Slug
cta
Related to NeurologyPocketBook (NPB) (Project Lead)
Status
WhatsApp
#
F
Related to Blog (2nd Author)
Property
CV
Supported by: IHIE and its Generous Sponsors!
Supported by: IHIE and its Generous Sponsors!

Institute of Health Innovation & Education (IHIE)

Transforming Care & Education for the Digital Age!
Digital Education Ecosystem as a Service for Digital Healthcare!
https://instituteofhealthinnovation.com
"If anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind"
"If anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind"
An AINeuroCare Academy Project - Digital Education for Digital Healthcare!

💡 Learn! 🎥 YouTube 🎓 Academy 💌 Newsletter 📝 Blog
👨‍⚕️ Connect! 🕊️ Twitter 🖇️  Linkedin 📹  TikTok 📷 Instagram 🗣 Facebook
🌱 Living 📚 Pocketbook of 🧠 Neurology
🌱 Living 📚 Pocketbook of 🧠 Neurology
Applied, Concise, Practical, Up-to-date, Mobile-friendly, peer-reviewed & Free-Access Pocketbook of Neurology and related clinical specialties

Disclaimer: For Education purposes only. You must NOT rely on the information on this website as an alternative to medical advice from your healthcare provider

©️ 2022 NeuroCare.AI™ Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved